For that, try 1.17.īy the way, can the pre-BW StarCraft be played on Bnet? What I’m saying is that 1.26 is a far cry from the Classic version. Followed by numerous balance patches and 3 more neutral heroes. An expansion with 3 units per race, 5 neutral heroes, buildings and items. All the RoC players were picked up during this period, I wonder? Don’t bring up BW because the whole point of BW is that it doesn’t change. You are using “expansion” as a meaningless buzzword. Its all just semantics and opinion, but imo reforged is an expansion, but we are losing the “Classic” tft in the process… the whole point of my thread is that there should be 2 separate ladders, one that retains classic TFT and one that allows for new changes Things need to be streamlined because they aren’t on the same progression level as we started out with from the beginning. In the end this game has the potential to be the gateway RTS for some new generation of gamers who look on it as fondly as some of us looked back on WC3. I just tend to look at these things from a wider perspective than ‘what is best for me’. Again, my only interest is in custom games. It would help newcomers integrate themselves into the game as well, and not be confused which ladder to start playing as if they needed to learn RoC before moving up the next level to TFT or something.īut I’m not an expert on this. It really should be one game that we’re all talking about. It splinters the community and the community is small enough as it is. I agree that there is nothing wrong with RoC having its own system.īut I think for the game overall, having separate ladders for each iteration of the game (RoC, TFT, Reforged) would not be a good idea overall.